> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://monopolyprotocolone.gitbook.io/monopolyprotocol-docs/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://monopolyprotocolone.gitbook.io/monopolyprotocol-docs/protocol/rwa-data-and-asset-mapping.md).

# RWA Data and Asset Mapping Framework

MONOPOLY Protocol treats RWA as a structured foundation for real-world asset information, risk events and market judgments, rather than merely a tool for moving assets on chain or issuing tokens. At its current stage, the protocol focuses on turning verifiable asset data and event information into traceable, definable and tradable market inputs, building data, rule and risk infrastructure for more mature asset digitization scenarios in the future.

## 3.1 Three Layers of Asset Representation

MONOPOLY Protocol divides the information representation of real-world assets into an asset information layer, an event layer and a market layer.

| **Layer**               | **Core content**                                                                                                                                          | **Current role**                                                       |
| ----------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Asset information layer | Asset categories, public materials, price data, data sources, update times, risk information and available descriptions of rights structures.             | Establish a traceable and verifiable data foundation.                  |
| Event layer             | Maturity, repayment, default, restructuring, disposal, rating changes, public disclosures, price movements and other events affecting asset expectations. | Translate real-world changes into definable, verifiable market events. |
| Market layer            | Prediction markets for event outcomes, price ranges, time milestones and risk outcomes.                                                                   | Produce public, tradable market judgments and risk expectations.       |

Every event entering the market layer should be linked to its data sources, data versions, timestamps, outcome determination conditions and exception handling rules. Market participants trade judgments about public outcomes or risk events; they do not directly acquire ownership, debt claims, rights to returns or other legal rights in the underlying assets.

## 3.2 RWA Data Processing

The protocol prioritizes public data and verifiable information, using standardized processing to turn different categories of asset information into data objects that markets can use.

Public data sources → Data structuring and version recording → Primary and backup data source validation → Asset event identification → Market template configuration → Prediction market trading and outcome settlement.

The first phase prioritizes asset and market information with transparent prices, public disclosures or clear outcome conditions. This includes publicly available securities-related data, government bond yields and interest rate data, on-chain RWA protocol data, major cryptoasset data, index data and industry operating indicators.

RWA capabilities at this stage serve three main objectives: providing verifiable market subjects and settlement evidence for prediction markets; giving users market-based tools to understand asset risks and public events; and building reusable data formats, asset event templates and a risk labeling system for the protocol.

## 3.3 Interfaces for Enterprise Asset Digitization

Corporate restructuring, debt restructuring, bankruptcy liquidation and asset disposal commonly involve fragmented information, difficult valuations, lengthy disposal processes and complex groups of participants. MONOPOLY Protocol will reserve standardized data and service interfaces for these scenarios as a medium- to long-term differentiating direction.

| **Interface area**      | **Main content**                                                                                                                             |
| ----------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Asset description       | Asset category, basic materials, disposal status and public information sources.                                                             |
| Rights and restrictions | Disclosable rights structures, transfer restrictions, priority rankings and risk explanations.                                               |
| Valuation and progress  | Valuation basis, valuation date, disposal milestones, and restructuring or liquidation progress.                                             |
| Events and disclosures  | Material events, repayment arrangements, changes in risk and information update records.                                                     |
| Service providers       | Integration with asset service providers, SPVs, custodians, auditors or other professional participants where applicable conditions are met. |

At the current stage, these interfaces primarily support asset information display, risk event tracking, data standardization and market judgments. They do not mean that the protocol directly issues, sells, guarantees, holds in custody or redeems any real-world asset.

If applicable laws, asset rights structures, service providers’ capabilities and business conditions permit in the future, the protocol may integrate enterprise asset digitization and professional asset services within the relevant framework. Reserving these interfaces does not constitute a commitment regarding any specific asset project, returns, liquidity or issuance outcomes.